Case Results
Landlord Wins Appellate Decision Against Tenant
I argued the cause for respondent, Edward Goinski, on appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-5718-19. Plaintiffs Alisa Jennings and John E. Georgas sued Defendant, Goinski, for treble damages and fees under the Anti-Eviction Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1 to -61.12, and filed a claim under the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20. A summary of the case follows;
Landlord Eviction For Personal Occupancy and Non-Payment of Rent
On August 31, 2017, Goinski's prior counsel sent a third notice to quit, informing the tenants of his client's intent to personally occupy the property and demanding their eviction by 11:59PM on October 31, 2017. The parties appeared in Court in September 2017 to address the failure of rent payment from Georgas and Jennings. Allegedly, they withheld their rent due to conditions in their home, and the court ordered Goinski to make repairs prior to releasing withheld rent. Trial on Goinski's summary dispossess complaint was scheduled for October 30, 2017, where both parties entered into a consent judgement, granting Goinski a judgement of possession. The terms stated that the tenants were permitted to remain until January 31, 2018, provided they pay $2,000 in rent of the $4,000 owed. The consent judgement did not mention Goinski's previous intent to occupy due to his August 31, 2017 notice being premature at the time the consent judgement was reached. Nevertheless, Georgas and Jennings inquired whether or not Goinski lived in the apartment after their eviction. Their August 2019 complaint held two counts: (1) allegedly, they vacated the premises as a result of Goinski's notice regarding his intention to personally occupy, but then he "arbitrarily failed" to do so, and (2) such failure to occupy the property violated the Consumer Fraud Act. The Court granted Ghoinski summary judgement.
Legal Issues Before the Appellate Court
The legal issue before the Appellate Division is whether Goinski was obligated to personally occupy the residency on the basis of his August 31, 2017 notice, such that his failure to do so would allow for compensation under the Anti-Eviction Act or the Consumer Fraud Act. However, the eviction of Georgas and Jennings was not based upon Goinski's notice to quit. Rather, when both parties mutually entered the consent judgement, Goinski waived his right to secure possession through intent to occupy and the tenants waived their right to damages if he did not comply.
How We Won an Eviction For Personal Occupancy Case For The Landlord
Regarding the Consumer Fraud Claim, as the consumers, Georgas and Jennings are required to demonstrate ascertainable loss as a result of unlawful conduct by the Landlord. In fact, the Court held that the notice to quit based upon personal occupancy was not wrongful. Irrespective of Goinski's intent to occupy, the existence or lack thereof of his occupancy of the residency is not considered material as he withdrew his expression of intent by agreeing to the consent judgement. Rather than suffering ascertainable loss, the tenants received discounted rent and were granted extended tenancy. Therefore, the landlord in this case is not liable to the tenant for damages under the Anti-Eviction Act and did not violate the Consumer Fraud Act.
Case Result
Dismissal With Prejudice
Get Help Now
If you’re ready to learn more about how you can obtain personal representation that gets results, take a minute to fill out the contact form below.
Connect With Us
The Law Office of Charles E. Tempio, LLC
1401 Valley Road, Suite 302
Wayne, NJ 07470
Satellite Office:
252 Boulevard
Hasbrouck Heights, NJ, 07604
Phone: 862-221-9291
Fax: 862-221-9293
Office Hours: M-F: 9:00AM to 5:00PM
Saturday by appointment only
Our office is located on the 3rd floor of the
Chase Bank Building at the intersection of
Hamburg Turnpike and Valley Road.
Disclaimer: The Law Firm of Charles E. Tempio, LLC has prepared the content of this website for general informational purposes only. This content should not be construed as legal advice, recommendations, or an offer to perform services. You should not act upon any information provided on this site without seeking professional legal counsel from an attorney licensed to practice law in your jurisdiction. No representations are made as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained on this site or on any linked sites.
The webpage is not intended to solicit or form an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship is only established upon signing a retainer agreement and paying the required fee. Please do not send any confidential information until an attorney-client relationship has been established. The information contained on this website shall not be construed as legal advice. The Firm does not guarantee any result and prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. This is an attorney advertisement webpage for informational purposes only. This is a debt relief agency. The content of any email sent to The Law Firm of Charles E. Tempio, LLC or any of its attorneys at the email addresses provided on this website will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential.
IN NO EVENT SHALL THE LAW FIRM OF CHARLES E. TEMPIO, LLC BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RELATING TO THIS MATERIAL, THE USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ANY OTHER HYPERLINKED WEBSITE. The Law Firm of Charles E. Tempio, LLC takes no responsibility and makes no warranty for the content or information contained on sites linked to or from this site. All such links are provided solely for the convenience of users and do not represent any endorsement, advertisement, or sponsorship of linked sites or any products or services offered.
©2024 The Law Office of Charles E. Tempio, LLC, All Rights Reserved, Reproduced with Permission | Privacy Policy | Site Map